Jump to content

The Moral Landscape

From Archania

Morality is how we stay coherent in a crowded world. This portal maps that terrain in three moves: from the felt psychology of being seen, to the formal scaffolding that makes cooperation and fairness hold, to the design moves that turn insight into practice.

Psychological Patterns follows the lived experience—how actions leave a behavioral odor, how groups manufacture scent with symbols and purity codes, how mimetic rivalry breeds scapegoats, and how shadows (personal and collective) accumulate as karma across time.

Foundations of Moral Understanding builds the structure beneath the stories: symmetry → fairness, information/feedback → stability and harmony, game theory → reciprocity and cooperative equilibria. The claim is descriptive: why certain ethical forms become stable under real constraints.

Moral Action turns the map into moves: refactor conversations as games with better rules, shift from extrinsic compliance to intrinsic motive, balance value pluralism without sliding into extremism, and navigate the perennial trade-off between stability and autonomy.

Quick route: PsychologyFoundationsAction.

Psychological Patterns

Main article: /Psychological Patterns

This pillar explores how moral cognition begins as meta-perception (being seen) and then scales through symbolic group life. It frames morality as emerging from behavioral odor management (reputation, shame/guilt), moving through mimetic rivalry and scapegoating, into shadow dynamics (personal and collective), and finally to collective karma across time.

You’ll find in the full article
  • Behavioral Odor Management: morality as managing the “scent” of actions (Genesis/karma lenses; group-manufactured odors).
  • Mimetic Theory & Scapegoating: desire → rivalry → blame-routing; the “clean-hands” aesthetic vs. real outcomes.
  • Shadows & the Mare: Jungian shadow, sleep-paralysis folklore, and moral initiation.
  • Collective Shadows & Karma: how structures encode harm; how residues of action accumulate across groups and eras.
  • Nested Model of Morality: micro→macro alignment (person ↔ society ↔ biosphere ↔ cosmos).

Foundations of Moral Understanding

Main article: /Foundations of Moral Understanding

This pillar develops the structural and formal scaffolding for moral realism on Archania: from mathematical primitives (number, symmetry, information) to probability/feedback/control and game theory (equilibria, Folk Theorem, ESS). It also articulates a holistic moral framework where fairness (from symmetry), cooperation (from incentives/selection), and harmony (from control/signal theory) together ground objective moral structure.

You’ll find in the full article
  • Mathematical Foundations: symmetry → fairness; information/feedback → stability; games → cooperation.
  • Harmony & Control: resonance/equilibrium as structural contributors to “the good.”
  • Repeated Games & Reciprocity: why high δ sustains cooperation; ESS and selection-based stability.
  • Authentic Understanding: work the diagram end-to-end; re-derive the links and limits (not mere slogans).
  • Holistic Frame: “good” strengthens the whole across nested systems; cautions on gray zones and trade-offs.

Moral Action

Main article: /Moral Action

This pillar turns theory into design and practice. It treats communication as a game with rules (not just nicer players), shows how to rebuild incentives for discovery and synthesis, and connects motivation, value pluralism, and stability–autonomy trade-offs to actionable norms.

You’ll find in the full article
  • Communication as a Game: Win Game vs. Learn Game; redesign goals, incentives, roles, evidence norms.
  • Intrinsic Motivation & Spiritual Relations: from extrinsic compliance to inwardly anchored practice.
  • Fostering Meaningful Lives: eudaimonia/ikigai beyond employment/wealth metrics.
  • Value Pluralism & Extremism: balancing incommensurable values; avoiding single-value capture.
  • Stability & Autonomy: anchorage ↔ freedom as a societal design tension, not a zero-sum.